This is related to some random facebooking that occurred recently..(a while back actually, this was on another blog of mine but it makes more sense if it's posted over here)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=700540943298659&l=97575ea0c3
It says "time vortex" ...a vortex is something(a force maybe) that's gonna pull u down(usually) trying to place you at the center.. Right?? So a time vortex would be something that should put u at the center of time(????)
((What does that even mean?? I can't even imagine it! ....because it would involve questions about the magnitude and spread and other properties of time... that I don't think we're fully aware of....and also..
it would ask a fundamental question- What is time?
For all intended usage and purposes we use the term "relative change of something with respect to time" or a certain index of measured change with respect to something.....Now,
...given that everything exists in multidimensional space...and that something is space or a property of it..
(I don't know if matter and energy are properties of space or not..)
But assuming I'm right (correct me if I'm not)... then...
Time is --- measure of change of certain variable(s) within observed space.....
so, put another way........
*If we hold true the fact that space is constant in the fact that it is, was and always will be - Infinite....
(I had to re-edit the part where I wrote "constant and infinite" which sounded wrong because that's a paradox...)
Anyway......
It'd mean - change in that stuff would be time... (If we observed it).....
which would interpret to -
"observed-changing-space" = "time"....
meaning time is... actually... just - space ???? O_O
Suppose I've grasped it right this far..
coming back to to time vortexes which vortex u to right at the center of time(?)
Which is just - observed-changing-space because if time is observable-changing-space then...
...the same attributes should apply to the center of time as well
(unless u put in the cat..which leaves everything unobservable in a metastate of both existent and non existent probabilities (probabilities of changes in properties of space variable(s) &/or properties) )
..therefore..
The center of time is either the center of an unmeasurable-equally-distributed-space..
Conversely....
If time is unmeasurable - due to the fact that we don't really know where to begin or end OR even if there actually ARE beginnings and endings.....
...if everything is possible......due to supposedly infinite tendencies of space-time continuum...
Then there's also the probability of everything phasing in & out of existence (if that were actually true, and if this is in fact what's going on - we wouldn't know...
Everything would remain the same, including memories... meaning if time were reset we wouldn't know....
ALTERNATIVELY there's the probability of "frozen planes of existence" that continuously keep stacking up on top of each other.. Depending upon how the newest stack lands i.e. its configuration, our reality is chosen.. thus, giving us the perception of linear space-time,
where - time just moves forward and only forward & the only proof of our past are signatures left by space-time events that have occurred without errors, (i.e. if each stack fall configuration was perfect OR the signatures left by the recent-past-recent ( ? ) re-edits due to arbit configuration matching and re-matching &/or un-matching....(sort of like sequence assembly by the best fit) ultimately yielding a perfect fit (if that even exists or is necessary)
So what happens IF we forget the key term "configuration".....while everything is possible in an infinite space-time event, the fact that everything is possible itself makes exclusions for certain configurations to be unable to stack and hence fall apart or distort or maybe even remodelled again and again.... Hence, that reality (the one with a bad config) is never chosen and it's either completely destroyed due to complete antagonistic properties.. Or they keep piling up creating a distorted stack where although not completely destroyed &/or created.... They stagnate(?) till a compatible (or the opposite) reality block falls...such a space-time event would be difficult to comprehend because there'd be all sorts if distortions &/or loops &/or holes...it's like trial & error with the planes of reality which would determine which spacetime event would be chosen...
This stuff is something I have just stated all by myself while trying to reply to that facebook photo comment...I haven't read anything of this sort anywhere in depth..I'm just vaguely familiar with the "Brane" theory and the sorts..stuff they keep showing on TV...but this reality stack building by configuration matching of reality blocks is something I thought of..or maybe other people did too and I'm unaware of.. In any case I'd need to prove this mathematically before anything is brought out for more scientific and less philosophical discussion..and at this point of time I do not have the skills to do so, I barely keep up with biostatistics (LOL)
Coming back to the concept of ..what black holes are & what their properties are and what they actually do....etc
according what they say (and if I've grasped it right)....put simply they bend the time-space continuum due to their immense gravitational force...in general the higher the gravitational force greater the dent on the space-time grid aka fabric...density depends on space (more objects in less space = dense........the same objects in more space = less dense)....
Gravitational force is an outcome of density of matter....(of (questionable) matter because if we're fundamentally probability distributions like the reality stack analogy there is a likelihood that there are metastates when there is neither matter nor energy...Or just either or both....)
What goes inside? or more appropriately IF it goes inside..is a matter yet to be resolved unless I'm outdated.
The clause "IF"is important not only because of the properties of our space-time events that make it impossible (Eg: stretching of time and compression of space etc....)
But also because of simpler and more fundamental fact that it's insanely super dense.. If I were to give an example..Suppose a wall...although nothing compared to the might of a black hole's density, to humans a wall feels quite dense.....So, have you ever tried walking through it?? What happens if and when you do land intact somehow on a black hole is a very good question that no one has answers to.... My point is, you can't go through a black hole because it is not a hole.. See... Hole = space...right?
Matter occupies space and has mass & density etc etc etc....
therefore, if a blackhole is the outcome of compression of matter of mass that is at least 4x the mass of our Sun - Sol... then...logically, since when did condensing and compressing matter yield more space within that matter....???
Ok now for the last bit...
Frequently they've also been associated with terms like singularity...due to the presumably infinite space time curvature arising due to the almost infinite gravitational force which in turn arises from the a significantly dense mass to do so i.e. have so much gravitational attraction that it overpowers the other three fundamental forces governing matter..this is aka The Chandrasekhar limit which is approx 4x mass of the sun...
Anyway...Also..there's nothing implying singularity being the center.. I mean if u think about it.. A center needs to be surrounded by something equally wrt all possible dimensions..
Whereas singularity is....just a point (?????????)
A point where the matter is so dense that it almost approaches a density so high..gravity so high..space-time curvature so deep..that...it is a big " ? " (time progressively getting slower and space smaller due to more intense gravity that overpowers other 3 forces (governing strongest repulsion properties as well) between the particles of that system.. A gravitational force that ultimately...all those things that made up a part of many..a bigger system.. Are now fused into one...keeping things in perspective, density depends on the no. of particles of a system...now that they've all fused into one.. They'd either have no density &/or/not have a new unique property...
I'm not an astrophysicist so don't hesitate to correct me where I go wrong....in fact I'm a Masters student in Zoology and had a horrible exam which went real bad..today... :(
But I really am interested in this stuff, if I've gone wrong with my interpretations somewhere, I'd like to get it right...I love this stuff so much, I'm willing to re-learn everything from scratch especially math, right from basic counting - 1 ,2 ,3 . . .
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=700540943298659&l=97575ea0c3
It says "time vortex" ...a vortex is something(a force maybe) that's gonna pull u down(usually) trying to place you at the center.. Right?? So a time vortex would be something that should put u at the center of time(????)
((What does that even mean?? I can't even imagine it! ....because it would involve questions about the magnitude and spread and other properties of time... that I don't think we're fully aware of....and also..
it would ask a fundamental question- What is time?
For all intended usage and purposes we use the term "relative change of something with respect to time" or a certain index of measured change with respect to something.....Now,
...given that everything exists in multidimensional space...and that something is space or a property of it..
(I don't know if matter and energy are properties of space or not..)
But assuming I'm right (correct me if I'm not)... then...
Time is --- measure of change of certain variable(s) within observed space.....
so, put another way........
*If we hold true the fact that space is constant in the fact that it is, was and always will be - Infinite....
Anyway......
It'd mean - change in that stuff would be time... (If we observed it).....
which would interpret to -
"observed-changing-space" = "time"....
meaning time is... actually... just - space ???? O_O
Suppose I've grasped it right this far..
coming back to to time vortexes which vortex u to right at the center of time(?)
Which is just - observed-changing-space because if time is observable-changing-space then...
...the same attributes should apply to the center of time as well
(unless u put in the cat..which leaves everything unobservable in a metastate of both existent and non existent probabilities (probabilities of changes in properties of space variable(s) &/or properties) )
..therefore..
The center of time is either the center of an unmeasurable-equally-distributed-space..
Conversely....
If time is unmeasurable - due to the fact that we don't really know where to begin or end OR even if there actually ARE beginnings and endings.....
...if everything is possible......due to supposedly infinite tendencies of space-time continuum...
Then there's also the probability of everything phasing in & out of existence (if that were actually true, and if this is in fact what's going on - we wouldn't know...
Everything would remain the same, including memories... meaning if time were reset we wouldn't know....
ALTERNATIVELY there's the probability of "frozen planes of existence" that continuously keep stacking up on top of each other.. Depending upon how the newest stack lands i.e. its configuration, our reality is chosen.. thus, giving us the perception of linear space-time,
where - time just moves forward and only forward & the only proof of our past are signatures left by space-time events that have occurred without errors, (i.e. if each stack fall configuration was perfect OR the signatures left by the recent-past-recent ( ? ) re-edits due to arbit configuration matching and re-matching &/or un-matching....
So what happens IF we forget the key term "configuration".....while everything is possible in an infinite space-time event, the fact that everything is possible itself makes exclusions for certain configurations to be unable to stack and hence fall apart or distort or maybe even remodelled again and again.... Hence, that reality (the one with a bad config) is never chosen and it's either completely destroyed due to complete antagonistic properties.. Or they keep piling up creating a distorted stack where although not completely destroyed &/or created.... They stagnate(?) till a compatible (or the opposite) reality block falls...such a space-time event would be difficult to comprehend because there'd be all sorts if distortions &/or loops &/or holes...it's like trial & error with the planes of reality which would determine which spacetime event would be chosen...
This stuff is something I have just stated all by myself while trying to reply to that facebook photo comment...I haven't read anything of this sort anywhere in depth..I'm just vaguely familiar with the "Brane" theory and the sorts..stuff they keep showing on TV...but this reality stack building by configuration matching of reality blocks is something I thought of..or maybe other people did too and I'm unaware of.. In any case I'd need to prove this mathematically before anything is brought out for more scientific and less philosophical discussion..and at this point of time I do not have the skills to do so, I barely keep up with biostatistics (LOL)
Coming back to the concept of ..what black holes are & what their properties are and what they actually do....etc
according what they say (and if I've grasped it right)....put simply they bend the time-space continuum due to their immense gravitational force...in general the higher the gravitational force greater the dent on the space-time grid aka fabric...density depends on space (more objects in less space = dense........the same objects in more space = less dense)....
Gravitational force is an outcome of density of matter....
What goes inside? or more appropriately IF it goes inside..is a matter yet to be resolved unless I'm outdated.
The clause "IF"is important not only because of the properties of our space-time events that make it impossible (Eg: stretching of time and compression of space etc....)
But also because of simpler and more fundamental fact that it's insanely super dense.. If I were to give an example..Suppose a wall...
Matter occupies space and has mass & density etc etc etc....
therefore, if a blackhole is the outcome of compression of matter of mass that is at least 4x the mass of our Sun - Sol... then...logically, since when did condensing and compressing matter yield more space within that matter....???
Ok now for the last bit...
Frequently they've also been associated with terms like singularity...due to the presumably infinite space time curvature arising due to the almost infinite gravitational force which in turn arises from the a significantly dense mass to do so i.e. have so much gravitational attraction that it overpowers the other three fundamental forces governing matter..this is aka The Chandrasekhar limit which is approx 4x mass of the sun...
Anyway...Also..there's nothing implying singularity being the center.. I mean if u think about it.. A center needs to be surrounded by something equally wrt all possible dimensions..
Whereas singularity is....just a point (?????????)
A point where the matter is so dense that it almost approaches a density so high..gravity so high..space-time curvature so deep..that...it is a big " ? " (time progressively getting slower and space smaller due to more intense gravity that overpowers other 3 forces (governing strongest repulsion properties as well) between the particles of that system.. A gravitational force that ultimately...all those things that made up a part of many..a bigger system.. Are now fused into one...keeping things in perspective, density depends on the no. of particles of a system...now that they've all fused into one.. They'd either have no density &/or/not have a new unique property...
I'm not an astrophysicist so don't hesitate to correct me where I go wrong....in fact I'm a Masters student in Zoology and had a horrible exam which went real bad..today... :(
But I really am interested in this stuff, if I've gone wrong with my interpretations somewhere, I'd like to get it right...I love this stuff so much, I'm willing to re-learn everything from scratch especially math, right from basic counting - 1 ,2 ,3 . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment